You know what's really sad about this? They're using a violation of one part of the first amendment (free speech) to justify violating another part (freedom of relegion).
Officials at The T said the incident had nothing to do with what Lutz was reading..."If she were reading 'Moby Dick' or reciting the Pledge of Allegiance or reading anything else, the same thing would have occurred," said The T's Joan Hunter.
Violation of FREE SPEECH.
Pick your poison, I guess. Either way, they were clearly in the wrong.
1 comment:
You know what's really sad about this? They're using a violation of one part of the first amendment (free speech) to justify violating another part (freedom of relegion).
Officials at The T said the incident had nothing to do with what Lutz was reading..."If she were reading 'Moby Dick' or reciting the Pledge of Allegiance or reading anything else, the same thing would have occurred," said The T's Joan Hunter.
Violation of FREE SPEECH.
Pick your poison, I guess. Either way, they were clearly in the wrong.
Post a Comment